Post by the Scribe on Mar 11, 2020 11:44:01 GMT
The far right is now playing a very prominent role in shaping the world and the objectives of the world controllers.
It is no coincidence that all over the west we are seeing a sharp rise in far right movements, and politics being driven by far right wing agendas.
It is also no coincidence that some alternative media operations like infowars are doing absolutely nothing to expose this agenda, and even worse are taking a major role in promoting it.
WHAT DO THE WORLD CONTROLLERS WANT?
There are many speculations about this, and I think it is safe to assume that they want as much political and economic control over the globe as possible. Most people will agree with this. Many people however will disagree with WHO EXACTLY THESE CONTROLLERS ARE.
Whomever they are they certainly do not want worldwide solidarity and are meticulously focused on dividing the world population so they are always fighting amongst one another. They also want a large portion of people to willingly SUPPORT their agendas, which is precicely why they have agendas being promoted by the leaders of choice on both the right and left wings of the spectrum. So no matter which team you choose, you will ultimately be supporting a certain element of their overall agenda.
The right wing agenda is very often ignored. These are their objectives.
1. SCAPEGOAT THE STATE AND GOVERNMENT
For decades the radical right through groups like the John Birch Society, White Nationalist groups, Militia groups, Far right churches (The moral majority), Right wing think tanks have been building up the idea that THE STATE/GOVERNMENT is inherently evil/corrupt and that it needs to ultimately be taken down in order for FREEDOM and FREE MARKETS.
This entire ideology has been funded by some of the worlds biggest billionaires, most notably the Koch family, whose combined assets make them richer than anybody on the Forbes list.
The whole purpose of this is to promote AUSTERITY, DESTROY REGULATIONS FOR BIG BUSINESS AND BANKS, TAX RELIEF FOR BILLIONAIRES.
This flawed ideology does nothing but protect the oligarchs and focus on the much smaller problem of "corrupt government" WHICH IS CORRUPTED BY THE OLIGARCHS IN THE FIRST PLACE.
You will always hear the right and the far right talk about how corrupt government officials are but rarely do you hear them talk about oligarchs, big business, and bankers.
A far right political figure like Donald Trump will always talk about the corruption of Obama, Clinton, or whatever politician. The Clintons are worth over 100 million, Obama about 7 million. Does Trump talk about his friends like Carl Ichan, worth 17 billion ,or his pal Sheldon Adelson, worth 31 billion. Are we naively to believe that government is corrupt but the business world, where you need massive bank loans isn't ? GTFOH.
The far right will at times talk about "bankers" but it is always within the context of scapegoating Jews or making it all about some "left wing conspiracy" which is why they usually always talk about George Soros, who is both Jewish and a supposed "leftist".
The bankers are only talked about when they are financing some supposed "leftist conspiracy"
NO talk of the Koch brothers who of course basically finance the entire far right narrative and ideology.
The WHOLE PURPOSE IS TO THOROUGHLY DISCREDIT THE IDEA OF GOVERNMENT SO THAT PEOPLE WILL WILLINGLY PUSH FOR LESS REGULATION, MORE AUSTERITY, AND MORE TAX RELIEF FOR BILLIONAIRES ALL UNDER THE BANNER OF "SMALL GOVERNMENT" AND "FREEDOM" "FREE MARKETS"
This has been the goal of the oligarchs ever since FDR's "New Deal" policies which helped bring some level of prosperity to ordinary citizens. The far right like to hijack that success and claim it was "free markets" and "capitalism" which achieved this, but it was literally the opposite. It was the moderate socializing of the American government which brought about the middle class. They have also been actively trying to destroy the socialism in Europe through austerity measures.
The far right think tanks like Heritage Foundation, American Enterprise Institute, Coucil for National Policy, Cato Institute, Hoover Institute have been leading this objective backed by their proxies in the "truth movement" the anti-government militias, government controlled churches, "patriot groups" etc. All a part of the radical right machinery.
It is also important to establish the idea that this government corruption is predominantly of "leftist" and "progressive" nature and this will bring us to the next agenda of the far right.
2. CREATE THE MYTH OF A LEFTIST CONSPIRACY
Along with discrediting the government institutions on behalf of the oligarchs the far right dupes need to now believe in a far leftist conspiracy which has taken over their respective countries.
This of course is an old tactic which was used with the Fascist movements of the 30's, primarily with Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini. Ironically both fascist movements needed to use "leftist populism" and ideas of anti capitalism in order to create their mass movements.
It is generally agreed regardless of ones political affiliations that mass movements or leaders should be FOR THE PEOPLE and ANTI ELITIST, so of course Hitler played into this even though the very people he railed against were the ones financing his operation.
The far left conspiracy serves again to act as a SCAPEGOAT and to protect a greater evil, just like how the far right scapegoats government to protect the greater evil, the oligarchs. It serves ultimately as a piñata for all of the anger and indignation towards the elites. The angry masses who awaken to the crimes and manipulations of the "NWO" have something which to bear the brunt of their frustrations. Again the greater evil is off the hook for the distraction. This is precisely why so many in the "truth movement" or "alternative media" are there to guide the angry towards the so called "left or progressive conspiracy"
The destruction of the "left wing conspiracy/government" will pave way for the solution in the form of a Fascist dictatorship, which the right wing dupes will welcome as the saviour to their woes. This will also pave the way for Radical nationalism in the form of "American Exceptionalism" a form of Nazism. The backlash against the so called "leftist conspiracy" will be so great that this form of aggressive nationalism will be embraced.
For decades the idea that "leftists" "progressives" "communists" have taken over the government and media, banking etc. has been put into the minds of Western populations. These ideas again trace right back to think tanks and right wing organizations, pseudo grass movements all funded by billionaires. These were originally somewhat limited to fringe groups originally but are now a part of mainstream media and politics via outlets like Rupert Murdochs FOX NEWS.
Again this primarily began after FDR's New Deal reforms bringing elements of socialism to America. This for many of the far right conspiracy theorists was a beginning point, but we can also see that the Civil Rights movement was a major moment as well.
Minorities achieving "equal rights" became a threat to many far right groups and organizations. The John Birch Society was at the forefront of fighting Civil rights, defending Apartheid South Africa, and maintaining white privilege. It is no surprise that todays proxies of the JBS continue with the same race baiting and fear mongering. The far right has always tried to characterize "the left wing conspiracy" as ANTI WHITE. They still do today. They continuously project their deep seeded racism onto their political opponents, this is one of their main tactics. This is done in order to create division, but also to scare white people away from any ideas of socialism. To the far right socialism=anti white racism. This is the kind of absurdity they are dealing with. The KKK also tried to scare black people away from ideas of socialism, but with threats and murder.
As long as the idea that socialism/progressivism HATES WHITE PEOPLE, which again is totally absurd is out there in the public, then the far right is well on their way to suppressing socialism and "progressivism" in general.
*****
Those are all points I and others here have been railing about for years. The latest budget submitted by Ratboy Ryan gives the bulk of the tax cuts once again to the wealthy. Trump's campaign released their proposed tax plan for the US and most of the cuts go to the wealthy.
Conservatism is a mental disease. Yes, they are born that way and can't or won't help themselves because they don't recognize their illness. And you cannot reason with them as their minds are incapable of critical thinking and common sense. It is a waste of time. The best thing to do is to KEEP THEM OUT OF POWER. They know how to steal elections. It is second nature to them. If they ever gain power again in the White House, especially a Trump or Bush like character we will be at war with the world. This time I doubt we can come out of it.
I am always amazed how the rightists accuse the Left of doing things that they are solely doing themselves.
Conservatism is a mental disease. Yes, they are born that way and can't or won't help themselves because they don't recognize their illness. And you cannot reason with them as their minds are incapable of critical thinking and common sense. It is a waste of time. The best thing to do is to KEEP THEM OUT OF POWER. They know how to steal elections. It is second nature to them. If they ever gain power again in the White House, especially a Trump or Bush like character we will be at war with the world. This time I doubt we can come out of it.
I am always amazed how the rightists accuse the Left of doing things that they are solely doing themselves.
THE 14 TRAITS OF THE RIGHT-WING EXTREMIST REPUBLICAN PARTY POLITICAL AGENDA:
1. Powerful and continuing expressions of nationalism. From the prominent displays of flags and bunting to the ubiquitous lapel pins, the fervor to show patriotic nationalism, both on the part of the regime itself and of citizens caught up in its frenzy, was always obvious. Catchy slogans, pride in the military, and demands for unity were common themes in expressing this nationalism. It was usually coupled with a suspicion of things foreign that often bordered on xenophobia.
2. Disdain for the importance of human rights. The regimes themselves viewed human rights as of little value and a hindrance to realizing the objectives of the ruling elite. Through clever use of propaganda, the population was brought to accept these human rights abuses by marginalizing, even demonizing, those being targeted. When abuse was egregious, the tactic was to use secrecy, denial, and disinformation.
3. Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause. The most significant common thread among these regimes was the use of scapegoating as a means to divert the people?s attention from other problems, to shift blame for failures, and to channel frustration in controlled directions. The methods of choice?relentless propaganda and disinformation?were usually effective. Often the regimes would incite ?spontaneous? acts against the target scapegoats, usually communists, socialists, liberals, Jews, ethnic and racial minorities, traditional national enemies, members of other religions, secularists, homosexuals, and ?terrorists.? Active opponents of these regimes were inevitably labeled as terrorists and dealt with accordingly.
4. The supremacy of the military/avid militarism. Ruling elites always identified closely with the military and the industrial infrastructure that supported it. A disproportionate share of national resources was allocated to the military, even when domestic needs were acute. The military was seen as an expression of nationalism, and was used whenever possible to assert national goals, intimidate other nations, and increase the power and prestige of the ruling elite.
5. Rampant sexism. Beyond the simple fact that the political elite and the national culture were male-dominated, these regimes inevitably viewed women as second-class citizens. They were adamantly anti-abortion and also homophobic. These attitudes were usually codified in Draconian laws that enjoyed strong support by the orthodox religion of the country, thus lending the regime cover for its abuses.
6. A controlled mass media. Under some of the regimes, the mass media were under strict direct control and could be relied upon never to stray from the party line. Other regimes exercised more subtle power to ensure media orthodoxy. Methods included the control of licensing and access to resources, economic pressure, appeals to patriotism, and implied threats. The leaders of the mass media were often politically compatible with the power elite. The result was usually success in keeping the general public unaware of the regimes? excesses.
7. Obsession with national security. Inevitably, a national security apparatus was under direct control of the ruling elite. It was usually an instrument of oppression, operating in secret and beyond any constraints. Its actions were justified under the rubric of protecting ?national security,? and questioning its activities was portrayed as unpatriotic or even treasonous.
8. Religion and ruling elite tied together. Unlike communist regimes, the fascist and protofascist regimes were never proclaimed as godless by their opponents. In fact, most of the regimes attached themselves to the predominant religion of the country and chose to portray themselves as militant defenders of that religion. The fact that the ruling elite?s behavior was incompatible with the precepts of the religion was generally swept under the rug. Propaganda kept up the illusion that the ruling elites were defenders of the faith and opponents of the ?godless.? A perception was manufactured that opposing the power elite was tantamount to an attack on religion.
9. Power of corporations protected. Although the personal life of ordinary citizens was under strict control, the ability of large corporations to operate in relative freedom was not compromised. The ruling elite saw the corporate structure as a way to not only ensure military production (in developed states), but also as an additional means of social control. Members of the economic elite were often pampered by the political elite to ensure a continued mutuality of interests, especially in the repression of ?have-not? citizens.
10. Power of labor suppressed or eliminated. Since organized labor was seen as the one power center that could challenge the political hegemony of the ruling elite and its corporate allies, it was inevitably crushed or made powerless. The poor formed an underclass, viewed with suspicion or outright contempt. Under some regimes, being poor was considered akin to a vice.
11. Disdain and suppression of intellectuals and the arts. Intellectuals and the inherent freedom of ideas and expression associated with them were anathema to these regimes. Intellectual and academic freedom were considered subversive to national security and the patriotic ideal. Universities were tightly controlled; politically unreliable faculty harassed or eliminated. Unorthodox ideas or expressions of dissent were strongly attacked, silenced, or crushed. To these regimes, art and literature should serve the national interest or they had no right to exist.
12. Obsession with crime and punishment. Most of these regimes maintained Draconian systems of criminal justice with huge prison populations. The police were often glorified and had almost unchecked power, leading to rampant abuse. ?Normal? and political crime were often merged into trumped-up criminal charges and sometimes used against political opponents of the regime. Fear, and hatred, of criminals or ?traitors? was often promoted among the population as an excuse for more police power.
13. Rampant cronyism and corruption. Those in business circles and close to the power elite often used their position to enrich themselves. This corruption worked both ways; the power elite would receive financial gifts and property from the economic elite, who in turn would gain the benefit of government favoritism. Members of the power elite were in a position to obtain vast wealth from other sources as well: for example, by stealing national resources. With the national security apparatus under control and the media muzzled, this corruption was largely unconstrained and not well understood by the general population.
14. Fraudulent elections. Elections in the form of plebiscites or public opinion polls were usually bogus. When actual elections with candidates were held, they would usually be perverted by the power elite to get the desired result. Common methods included maintaining control of the election machinery, intimidating and disenfranchising opposition voters, destroying or disallowing legal votes, and, as a last resort, turning to a judiciary beholden to the power elite.
Does any of this ring alarm bells? Of course not. After all, this is America, officially a democracy with the rule of law, a constitution, a free press, honest elections, and a well-informed public constantly being put on guard against evils. Historical comparisons like these are just exercises in verbal gymnastics. Maybe, maybe not.
forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=6849021
Read more: ronstadt.proboards.com/thread/3832/democrat#ixzz4Dnr9Jsm9