Post by the Scribe on Jan 11, 2021 19:09:41 GMT
Associated Press
Supreme Court rejects fast track for Trump election cases
www.yahoo.com/news/supreme-court-rejects-fast-track-145539923.html
Mon, January 11, 2021, 7:55 AM MST
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court on Monday formally refused to put on a fast track election challenges filed by President Donald Trump and his allies.
apnews.com/hub/election-2020
The court rejected pleas for quick consideration of cases involving the outcome in five states won by President-elect Joe Biden: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
The orders, issued without comment, were unsurprising. The justices had previously taken no action in those cases in advance of last week's counting of the electoral votes in Congress, which confirmed Biden's victory.
The court still could act on appeals related to the Nov. 3 election later this winter or in the spring. Several justices had expressed interest in a Pennsylvania case involving the state Supreme Court's decision to extend the deadline for receipt of mailed ballots by three days, over the opposition of the Republican-controlled legislature.
But even if the court were to take up an election-related case, it probably wouldn't hear arguments until the fall.
Supreme Court rejects fast track for Trump election cases
www.yahoo.com/news/supreme-court-rejects-fast-track-145539923.html
Mon, January 11, 2021, 7:55 AM MST
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court on Monday formally refused to put on a fast track election challenges filed by President Donald Trump and his allies.
apnews.com/hub/election-2020
The court rejected pleas for quick consideration of cases involving the outcome in five states won by President-elect Joe Biden: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
The orders, issued without comment, were unsurprising. The justices had previously taken no action in those cases in advance of last week's counting of the electoral votes in Congress, which confirmed Biden's victory.
The court still could act on appeals related to the Nov. 3 election later this winter or in the spring. Several justices had expressed interest in a Pennsylvania case involving the state Supreme Court's decision to extend the deadline for receipt of mailed ballots by three days, over the opposition of the Republican-controlled legislature.
But even if the court were to take up an election-related case, it probably wouldn't hear arguments until the fall.