Post by the Scribe on Mar 18, 2020 23:20:51 GMT
Recently, I had to euthanize a cat that I have been fostering for almost a year. He was abandoned in a foreclosure and ended up in another's care who didn't want him. Leo was FIV positive. FIV in cats is not contagious as is feline leukemia but it is enough to scare any potential foster's or adopters. The agency that stepped in to help Leo could not find anyone willing to help him and were about to send him to animal control where he would surely be euthanized. This is where I stepped in. After a week in my care I noticed spots of blood on the floor in Leo's room only to discover a fast growing tumor (cancerous) on his hind quarters. His sponsoring agency's vet said Leo should be euthanized as the tumor was too large to operate but because they would not allow me to be with him for that procedure I insisted he go to my vet as they would allow me to be with him. (I do not allow any of the animals in my care to be euthanized without me there to comfort them in their final moments.) To my surprise my vet says "would you like me to remove the tumor?"She did and he came home with me to recover however in that process she discovered a heart murmur.
I researched everything I could about feline cancer and it's treatment ... current and alternative methods. I immediately started him on curcuvet (curcumin/tumeric) but 3 months later another tumor sprouted, same area. After his second operation he began to fall ill again only to find out this time it was his heart condition. After the heart scan procedure the prescribed meds seem to do the trick.
I tried another alternative cancer concoction called Life One but Leo would NOT let me syringe it into his mouth after the first time. He fought tooth and nail. I continued with the curcuvet and tried another treatment called Carnivora (supposedly used by Ronald Reagan after his cancer discovery). Even so the cancer came back after 3 months and this time with a vengeance but internally and externally.
On a fluke I found a website forum touting MMS and thought I had nothing to lose. By now Leo had lost the use of one leg and his tail was hanging lifeless. I found a local MMS contact and purchased a kit and was given instructions on how to use with a cat. Meanwhile Leo's condition was quite grave.
I began to use the MMS as prescribed, internally and externally. Internally I could not tell what was happening but externally I noticed the tumors stopped growing. After a week they began to shrink and a few days after that they "scabbed off."
Leo had even gained a pound and a half back. Unfortunately, he was so weak and his quality of life so poor I couldn't bear to see him like that just for the sake of this medical treatment so I euthanized him and have been second guessing my decision ever since.
What I do know is these external tumors were killed off using MMS. The previous ones had to be cut out. The MMS was obviously working. Unfortunately I hadn't found this product earlier in his illness or the result may have been different.
I keep reading incredible testimonials from people who have used this very inexpensive alternative treatment. And then there are the scare tactic warnings from the medical societies. I believe there is a lot of merit to MMS and would not hesitate to use it again, even on myself if necessary.
So I submit my testimonial as a starting point for anyone seeking more information about health alternatives that might just work for you or your pets. Just make sure you do your homework first.
MMS - Myth or Miracle?
Read more in our Health Matters Section!
By Ron Lee
Investigative Journalist
usobserver.com/archive/june-12/mms-myth-or-miracle.htm
Jim Humble
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) takes its regulation job seriously, seemingly targeting anyone who won't - or can't - play ball in its high-dollar industry-giants-only club. Unfortunately for Americans, it seems to have forgotten its edict to promote and protect public health.
Of the products that pass the FDA's “evaluation”, how many cause serious illness or death? LOTS. A few come to mind: NutraSweet (Aspartame) and Saccharin, Avandia, Chantix, Cymbalta, Enbrel, Gadolinium, Heparin, Levaquin, Mesh/Sling Implants, Paxil, Pradaxa, Reglan, Ritalin, Seroquel, Simvastatin/Amiodarone, Tylenol, Yasmin/Yaz, Zicam, many vaccines, and a great many “ food safe" additives the FDA has stamped with their approval. Just watch T.V. and pay attention to the umber of commercials asking people to call an attorney if they have taken any number of “FDA APPROVED” drugs/products that have caused serious harm or death. It is clear, just because the FDA evaluates something as safe, doesn't mean that it is.
So, when a product comes along that actually does have health benefit, the FDA appears to descend upon it in hopes to squash it from existence. Are they merely protecting the interests of the corporate giants and pharmaceutical behemoths that seek to keep us reliant upon dosages of their products? For the average American citizen, the answer seems pretty clear. "I don't trust the government, especially the FDA. The American people are sicker now and more apt to be on some prescription drug than any other time in history. How is this good? They [the FDA] keep attacking natural alternatives like raw cow and goat milk, plant extracts, home gardens and supplements that have proven positive results," says one such citizen, disillusioned with what they call "the bull the FDA is feeding us."
One exciting and reportedly "miraculous" health product is Master Mineral Solution - commonly referred to as MMS or “Cleansing Water”. By mixing MMS (sodium chlorite solution) and citric acid, it chemically generates the compound, chlorine dioxide (ClO2), which is said to have profound positive health benefits.
So now MMS and many involved with the movement are targets of the FDA. As reported in this edition, Daniel Smith, a man from Spokane, Washington whose business sold the ingredients to make chlorine dioxide in the privacy of your own home, had his home raided by federal agents. Subsequently, his case has been reviewed by two grand juries. It was through Daniel's efforts that the US~Observer became involved and has since launched an investigation into the legitimacy of the FDA claims, as well as the validity of MMS as a healing remedy.
The US~Observer has received hundreds of personal accounts of MMS healing users of a myriad of disorders, but we needed the truth in the form of documented fact. Then the US~Observer received the blood work of an individual who had been diagnosed with Hepatitis C. The reports were clear, this person had the disease. Reportedly, after the subject treated himself with MMS, there was no longer any sign of Hepatitis in his blood work!
But, this wasn't the only clinical evidence uncovered.
There was a controlled clinical evaluation of chlorine dioxide (the chemical created by mixing MMS [sodium chlorite] and citric acid) undertaken under the auspices of USEPA HERL #CR805643. It was designed to look into the potential health ramifications on the human body as the EPA was going to begin using chlorine dioxide in water treatment facilities. The outcome of the study as reported in "Controlled Clinical Evaluations of Chlorine Dioxide, Chlorite and Chlorate in Man," by Judith R. Lubbers, Sudha Chauan, and Joseph R. Bianchine:
"The three phases of this controlled double-blind clinical evaluation of chlorine dioxide and its potential metabolites in human male volunteer subjects were completed uneventfully. There were no obvious undesirable clinical sequellae noted by any of the participating subjects or by the observing medical team ... the absence of detrimental physiological responses within the limits of the study, the relative safety of oral ingestion of chlorine dioxide and its metabolites, chlorite and chlorate, was demonstrated."
Also, according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), who used Chlorine Dioxide to decontaminate office buildings and mail after the anthrax attacks in 2001, Chlorine Dioxide has:
“...been used since the early 1900s.
In 1967, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) initially registered liquid chlorine dioxide as a disinfectant and sanitizer for specific uses, such as animal farms, bottling plants, food processing, handling, and storage plants. It also included other uses, including:
• bleaching pulp and paper
• bleaching textiles
• washing fruit and vegetables
• disinfecting flume water
• disinfecting meat and poultry
• disinfecting food processing equipment
• sanitizing water
• controlling odors
• treating medical wastes
• treating municipal water”
The EPA also says: “Chlorine dioxide kills microorganisms by disrupting transport of nutrients across the cell wall. Chlorine dioxide smells somewhat like chlorine bleach. Chlorine dioxide should not be confused with chlorine gas. They are two distinct chemicals that react differently and produce by-products that have little in common.”
According to the many testimonials of individuals using MMS, it has successfully treated MERSA, cancer, the flu, infections, serious burns, arthritis, arteriosclerosis, stroke, asthma, Lyme disease, diabetes, hepatitis (all strains), leukemia, Lou Gehrig’s disease, HIV, AIDS, Herpes, spider bites, and malaria. It has also been reported that it successfully treats autism.
Basic logic would dictate that if it didn't work, or it caused adverse reactions, there wouldn't be so many who openly and fervently support MMS. There are sites all over the internet touting personal experiences with MMS. Groups on Facebook and even YouTube channels have been dedicated to its benefits. It has literally been used by millions around the globe.
Instead of looking into MMS's potential for the people's common health, the FDA has chosen to strike out at the claims of its benefits. They are doing this primarily because of the amount of positive personal experiences. You see, MMS has not been "evaluated". As such, it is potentially harmful in the eyes of the FDA, and they have even issued an alert on its use. But then again, growing your own garden (and sharing food), or milking your own cows is now dangerous too, at least according to the FDA. Do a search on the internet and see how the FDA is attacking these common practices which have been around since the dawn of time! In fact, it appears that any personal medicinal and food choice is being criminalized at an alarming rate. Soon, we will only be able to eat what they tell us; grow what Monsanto provides us; supplement and medicate ourselves with only the "best" unnatural chemicals created in the labs of the corporate partners to the FDA.
"If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny."
~Thomas Jefferson
Who would you trust? A cancer survivor who found life in a natural product, or a government agency that tells you to take products that it deems are safe that actually make you ill? Hmmm... tough question.
Through its research, the US~Observer has found more than enough evidence to expose the FDA for what it is; a scheme, with no constitutional authority to exist. It seems designed to keep some people wealthy while the rest of us are programmed into thinking they are there to help.
As for MMS, the US~Observer is conducting tests and is still collecting testimonials. Anyone with clinical proof of healing is asked to send copies of the evidence to: US~Observer, 233 Rogue River Hwy. PMB 387, Grants Pass, OR, 97527; or via email to editor@usobserver.com.
If you would like to learn more about MMS go to www.genesis2church.org or www.jimhumble.biz.
If you are interested in helping fight the FDA, the US~Observer has set-up a fund to meet that end.
I researched everything I could about feline cancer and it's treatment ... current and alternative methods. I immediately started him on curcuvet (curcumin/tumeric) but 3 months later another tumor sprouted, same area. After his second operation he began to fall ill again only to find out this time it was his heart condition. After the heart scan procedure the prescribed meds seem to do the trick.
I tried another alternative cancer concoction called Life One but Leo would NOT let me syringe it into his mouth after the first time. He fought tooth and nail. I continued with the curcuvet and tried another treatment called Carnivora (supposedly used by Ronald Reagan after his cancer discovery). Even so the cancer came back after 3 months and this time with a vengeance but internally and externally.
On a fluke I found a website forum touting MMS and thought I had nothing to lose. By now Leo had lost the use of one leg and his tail was hanging lifeless. I found a local MMS contact and purchased a kit and was given instructions on how to use with a cat. Meanwhile Leo's condition was quite grave.
I began to use the MMS as prescribed, internally and externally. Internally I could not tell what was happening but externally I noticed the tumors stopped growing. After a week they began to shrink and a few days after that they "scabbed off."
Leo had even gained a pound and a half back. Unfortunately, he was so weak and his quality of life so poor I couldn't bear to see him like that just for the sake of this medical treatment so I euthanized him and have been second guessing my decision ever since.
What I do know is these external tumors were killed off using MMS. The previous ones had to be cut out. The MMS was obviously working. Unfortunately I hadn't found this product earlier in his illness or the result may have been different.
I keep reading incredible testimonials from people who have used this very inexpensive alternative treatment. And then there are the scare tactic warnings from the medical societies. I believe there is a lot of merit to MMS and would not hesitate to use it again, even on myself if necessary.
So I submit my testimonial as a starting point for anyone seeking more information about health alternatives that might just work for you or your pets. Just make sure you do your homework first.
MMS - Myth or Miracle?
Read more in our Health Matters Section!
By Ron Lee
Investigative Journalist
usobserver.com/archive/june-12/mms-myth-or-miracle.htm
Jim Humble
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) takes its regulation job seriously, seemingly targeting anyone who won't - or can't - play ball in its high-dollar industry-giants-only club. Unfortunately for Americans, it seems to have forgotten its edict to promote and protect public health.
Of the products that pass the FDA's “evaluation”, how many cause serious illness or death? LOTS. A few come to mind: NutraSweet (Aspartame) and Saccharin, Avandia, Chantix, Cymbalta, Enbrel, Gadolinium, Heparin, Levaquin, Mesh/Sling Implants, Paxil, Pradaxa, Reglan, Ritalin, Seroquel, Simvastatin/Amiodarone, Tylenol, Yasmin/Yaz, Zicam, many vaccines, and a great many “ food safe" additives the FDA has stamped with their approval. Just watch T.V. and pay attention to the umber of commercials asking people to call an attorney if they have taken any number of “FDA APPROVED” drugs/products that have caused serious harm or death. It is clear, just because the FDA evaluates something as safe, doesn't mean that it is.
So, when a product comes along that actually does have health benefit, the FDA appears to descend upon it in hopes to squash it from existence. Are they merely protecting the interests of the corporate giants and pharmaceutical behemoths that seek to keep us reliant upon dosages of their products? For the average American citizen, the answer seems pretty clear. "I don't trust the government, especially the FDA. The American people are sicker now and more apt to be on some prescription drug than any other time in history. How is this good? They [the FDA] keep attacking natural alternatives like raw cow and goat milk, plant extracts, home gardens and supplements that have proven positive results," says one such citizen, disillusioned with what they call "the bull the FDA is feeding us."
One exciting and reportedly "miraculous" health product is Master Mineral Solution - commonly referred to as MMS or “Cleansing Water”. By mixing MMS (sodium chlorite solution) and citric acid, it chemically generates the compound, chlorine dioxide (ClO2), which is said to have profound positive health benefits.
So now MMS and many involved with the movement are targets of the FDA. As reported in this edition, Daniel Smith, a man from Spokane, Washington whose business sold the ingredients to make chlorine dioxide in the privacy of your own home, had his home raided by federal agents. Subsequently, his case has been reviewed by two grand juries. It was through Daniel's efforts that the US~Observer became involved and has since launched an investigation into the legitimacy of the FDA claims, as well as the validity of MMS as a healing remedy.
The US~Observer has received hundreds of personal accounts of MMS healing users of a myriad of disorders, but we needed the truth in the form of documented fact. Then the US~Observer received the blood work of an individual who had been diagnosed with Hepatitis C. The reports were clear, this person had the disease. Reportedly, after the subject treated himself with MMS, there was no longer any sign of Hepatitis in his blood work!
But, this wasn't the only clinical evidence uncovered.
There was a controlled clinical evaluation of chlorine dioxide (the chemical created by mixing MMS [sodium chlorite] and citric acid) undertaken under the auspices of USEPA HERL #CR805643. It was designed to look into the potential health ramifications on the human body as the EPA was going to begin using chlorine dioxide in water treatment facilities. The outcome of the study as reported in "Controlled Clinical Evaluations of Chlorine Dioxide, Chlorite and Chlorate in Man," by Judith R. Lubbers, Sudha Chauan, and Joseph R. Bianchine:
"The three phases of this controlled double-blind clinical evaluation of chlorine dioxide and its potential metabolites in human male volunteer subjects were completed uneventfully. There were no obvious undesirable clinical sequellae noted by any of the participating subjects or by the observing medical team ... the absence of detrimental physiological responses within the limits of the study, the relative safety of oral ingestion of chlorine dioxide and its metabolites, chlorite and chlorate, was demonstrated."
Also, according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), who used Chlorine Dioxide to decontaminate office buildings and mail after the anthrax attacks in 2001, Chlorine Dioxide has:
“...been used since the early 1900s.
In 1967, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) initially registered liquid chlorine dioxide as a disinfectant and sanitizer for specific uses, such as animal farms, bottling plants, food processing, handling, and storage plants. It also included other uses, including:
• bleaching pulp and paper
• bleaching textiles
• washing fruit and vegetables
• disinfecting flume water
• disinfecting meat and poultry
• disinfecting food processing equipment
• sanitizing water
• controlling odors
• treating medical wastes
• treating municipal water”
The EPA also says: “Chlorine dioxide kills microorganisms by disrupting transport of nutrients across the cell wall. Chlorine dioxide smells somewhat like chlorine bleach. Chlorine dioxide should not be confused with chlorine gas. They are two distinct chemicals that react differently and produce by-products that have little in common.”
According to the many testimonials of individuals using MMS, it has successfully treated MERSA, cancer, the flu, infections, serious burns, arthritis, arteriosclerosis, stroke, asthma, Lyme disease, diabetes, hepatitis (all strains), leukemia, Lou Gehrig’s disease, HIV, AIDS, Herpes, spider bites, and malaria. It has also been reported that it successfully treats autism.
Basic logic would dictate that if it didn't work, or it caused adverse reactions, there wouldn't be so many who openly and fervently support MMS. There are sites all over the internet touting personal experiences with MMS. Groups on Facebook and even YouTube channels have been dedicated to its benefits. It has literally been used by millions around the globe.
Instead of looking into MMS's potential for the people's common health, the FDA has chosen to strike out at the claims of its benefits. They are doing this primarily because of the amount of positive personal experiences. You see, MMS has not been "evaluated". As such, it is potentially harmful in the eyes of the FDA, and they have even issued an alert on its use. But then again, growing your own garden (and sharing food), or milking your own cows is now dangerous too, at least according to the FDA. Do a search on the internet and see how the FDA is attacking these common practices which have been around since the dawn of time! In fact, it appears that any personal medicinal and food choice is being criminalized at an alarming rate. Soon, we will only be able to eat what they tell us; grow what Monsanto provides us; supplement and medicate ourselves with only the "best" unnatural chemicals created in the labs of the corporate partners to the FDA.
"If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny."
~Thomas Jefferson
Who would you trust? A cancer survivor who found life in a natural product, or a government agency that tells you to take products that it deems are safe that actually make you ill? Hmmm... tough question.
Through its research, the US~Observer has found more than enough evidence to expose the FDA for what it is; a scheme, with no constitutional authority to exist. It seems designed to keep some people wealthy while the rest of us are programmed into thinking they are there to help.
As for MMS, the US~Observer is conducting tests and is still collecting testimonials. Anyone with clinical proof of healing is asked to send copies of the evidence to: US~Observer, 233 Rogue River Hwy. PMB 387, Grants Pass, OR, 97527; or via email to editor@usobserver.com.
If you would like to learn more about MMS go to www.genesis2church.org or www.jimhumble.biz.
If you are interested in helping fight the FDA, the US~Observer has set-up a fund to meet that end.